Judgment- In the year 2009, the Delhi high court decided this landmark judgement as a victory for equality and social justice but also in terms of its robust legal reasoning the Delhi high court concluded that “Section 377 IPC, insofar as it criminalizes consensual sexual acts of adults in private, is violative of Articles 21, 14 and 15 of.
T here has been a huge uproar throughout the country with people supporting the striking down of section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).The people who have successfully been able to adapt to the circumstances with time and the people who have a broader mindset wish to strike the section down.
Section 377 of the IPC was modeled on a 16th century law, called the Buggery Act. The Buggery Act was passed by the Parliament of England in 1533 when Henry VIII was the king. Buggery refers to anal intercourse and covers bestiality. The Buggery Act of 1533 was the first law in England that brought the offence of sodomy from the courts of.
Section 375: Analysis of Provisions Relating to Rape. On February 14, 2015 March 21, 2019 By kudrat.. It is submitted that by treating such forms of abuse as offenses falling under Section 354 IPC or 377 IPC, the very intent of the amendment of Section 376 IPC by incorporating Sub-section 2(f) therein is defeated.. 8 Replies to “Section.
Today, the Court held that Section 377 insofar as it criminalises consensual sexual acts between adult human beings, is unconstitutional and liable to be struck down. However, the Court made it clear that sex with animals, which also forms a part of Section 377, will remain a criminal offence. Here is how the pronouncement of the verdict unfolded.
For this purpose, Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which deals with unnatural offences will be analysed critically. The project will also deal with the constitutional validity of Section 377 and will suggest reforms in it. Unnatural offences. Unnatural offences are covered in IPC under section 377.